Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 13 results ...

Abowitz, D A and Toole, T M (2010) Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design, Validity, and Reliability in Construction Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 108–16.

Azhar, S, Ahmad, I and Sein, M K (2010) Action Research as a Proactive Research Method for Construction Engineering and Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 87–98.

Bernold, L E and Lee, T S (2010) Experimental Research in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 26–35.

Flood, I and Issa, R R A (2010) Empirical Modeling Methodologies for Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 36–48.

Gibson, G E and Whittington, D A (2010) Charrettes as a Method for Engaging Industry in Best Practices Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 66–75.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Best Management Practice; Construction management; Construction industry; Research; Methodology; Best management practices; Construction management; Construction industry; Lessons learned; Research methods;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000079
  • Abstract:
    Gaining innovative and useful research findings concerning construction industry best practices requires an interaction and feedback mechanism between industry respondents and academia. Typical research methods such as surveys, source document reviews, and structured interviews will work, but suffer from barriers which can hamper results. Examples of these barriers include low response rates, asynchronous communication, time commitment of the researchers and respondents, access to project data, and travel costs. Structured workshops (research “charrettes”) are a unique and useful method for facilitating data collection between industry respondents and academic researchers. They combine the best tenets of surveys, interviews, and focus groups in an accelerated time frame. This paper will explain how these workshops provide a critical avenue for industry interaction. Characteristics leading to successful charrettes will be outlined. The paper will conclude by describing the benefits of these workshops to researchers including lessons learned from successful workshops.

Green, S D, Kao, C and Larsen, G D (2010) Contextualist Research: Iterating between Methods While Following an Empirically Grounded Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 117–26.

Hallowell, M R and Gambatese, J A (2010) Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 99–107.

Kandil, A, El-Rayes, K and El-Anwar, O (2010) Optimization Research: Enhancing the Robustness of Large-Scale Multiobjective Optimization in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 17–25.

Leicht, R M, Hunter, S T, Saluja, C and Messner, J I (2010) Implementing Observational Research Methods to Study Team Performance in Construction Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 76–86.

Lucko, G and Mitchell, Z W (2010) Quantitative Research: Preparation of Incongruous Economic Data Sets for Archival Data Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 49–57.

Lucko, G and Rojas, E M (2010) Research Validation: Challenges and Opportunities in the Construction Domain. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 127–35.

Martinez, J C (2010) Methodology for Conducting Discrete-Event Simulation Studies in Construction Engineering and Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 3–16.

Phelps, A F and Horman, M J (2010) Ethnographic Theory-Building Research in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(01), 58–65.